#Proton email and dark web update

Additionally, The mastermind, cryptographer & back end developer that created Protonmail, Wei Sun, now works for Google.Ħ. The US media confirms these connections when they interview CRV so that they can understand In-Q-Tel. An analysis of staff members reveals CRV & In-Q-Tel connections. In-Q-Tel has been shown to be the bridge between the CIA and Gmail. In-Q-Tel has stated they have a specific interest in the information contained in e-mails and encrypted communication. The CIA openly operates a front company, In-Q-Tel, whose stated purpose is to invest in tech companies on behalf of the CIA. Protonmail staff member, Antonio Gambardella, also works for the Swiss Government. FONGIT is a Non Profit organization that is financed by the Swiss Government. Ted Ditersmith had also witnessed the Edward Snowden revelations and made statements that he planned to use his corporate knowledge to “fight terrorism”. His position as a delegate required close contact with CIA & NSA administration. At the time of the equity sale a CRV founder, Mr Ted Ditersmith, was working for the US State Department closely with President Obama. Protonmail is Part Owned by CRV and the Swiss GovernmentĪfter a successful crowdfunding campaign with promises to “remain independent” Protonmail sold equity ownership to CRV and FONGIT. We wrote a whole article about it here.Ĥ. Protonmail has tried to hide this part of their history. Gmail & Protonmail were both created in CIA/NSA funded departments with their oversight. Protonmail’s Was Created Under CIA/NSA Oversight Both Gmail and Protonmail offer encryption that they can decrypt whenever they want.ģ. Protonmail’s admission proves they offer the same security that Gmail offers. However they advertise that they can not. They can decrypt any of their user’s data be sending them scripts that allow them to do so. Then they continued to say: “We lied to our users because other email companies did”. by shitting on the security researcher that revealed their dishonesty. Their statement begins like you would expect it would. Protonmail was forced to issue a public statement.

When this was shown to be true, Protonmail users were outraged they had been lied to. Meaning, Protonmail has the ability to decrypt their own user’s data. Professor Nadim Kobeissi mathematically proved that Protonmail does not provide End to End Encryption. Protonmail Does Not Provide “End to End Encryption” Both possibilities are serious concerns.Ģ. This is a huge security issue that was either created because Protonmail is managed by Particle physicists who do not understand computer security OR they have been forced to operate their website in a similar way as CIA/NSA honeypots. In fact, the only other websites that operate like this are suspected NSA/CIA Honeypots. There are absolutely no technical reasons for this feature.

This breaks your secure encrypted connection to their onion address, enabling your identification. When a user makes a new account with Protonmail on TOR they are re-directed from Protonmail’s “.onion” to “.com” address. Protonmail even has an SSL cert for that onion address even though it’s completely unnecessary.

Protonmail has an Onion domain that allows users to visit their site using the TOR browser. Protonmail Behaves like a CIA/NSA “ Honeypot” We remain at your disposal for further questions.ġ.

We would be very grateful if you could take down the content of this article, and provide us with all available information regarding its author. It claims untrue and groundless “facts” about our Company and our services, which can cause great damages to our reputation and the conduct of our business.Īfter investigation, it appears that the website is held by your Company. We have recently been made aware of an article hosted on the website encryp.ch, and accessible via the following link. Our Company, Proton AG, is a provider of secured Internet services, including ProtonMail, and end-to-end encrypted email service.

#Proton email and dark web update

Update 8 domain registrator received abuse complaint against this article:.

Thanks to this comment author for adding two extra points (in this article they are 12 and 13).

Renamed title (and changed link) to “Disturbing facts about ProtonMail”, so no absolutely truth is meant.

I leaved it crossed out and did not delete it just for historical purposes

I have carefully read point 9 and the linked article to it, and now I can confirm that this is not a valid argument.

So, I have changed some things in this post: My thanks to the HN guys for their help and bunch of useful recommendations on this case. Disturbing facts about ProtonMail encryp.chĭisturbing facts about ProtonMail February 18, 2021